Is Hell Eternal?

Thanks, Jimmy. I’ll plan to start the topic “Conditioned immortality resurrected” this afternoon, unless someone on staff, like Sean, advises against it.

This will be exciting! at least for me. I greatly enjoy sharing a new vision of the love of God for even the most lost.

1 Like

@DeanW Hey Dean, @Jimmy_Sellers is correct - go for it! Also - I am not on staff.

I agree this is certainly a topic that deserves thorough discussion and pray the Lord would bless you with discernment as you consider it.

1 Like

Oh, i thought you were on staff somehow. Maybe you should be? :grin:

Since no one objected, i’ll go open the topic now. Thanks.

1 Like

Hello,

I’m new and very late to this conversation! I also hold the view of annihilationism but without going into all of the verses that seem to support this I wanted to raise a point/question.

If the price for or sins is eternal conscious suffering then how could Jesus have paid the price for our sins?

I only ask this because some very prominent apologists from RZIM, who we all respect, seem to believe in eternal conscious suffering but I wonder how they would answer this question which I could not answer and led me to my current belief on hell. Thanks.

1 Like

Hi, James. I am in the exact same situation you express here, so i will be looking forward to any responses you get. Thanks for bringing it up.

1 Like

Well, James, it doesn’t look like there will be any responses to your question, and i think it is my fault. I kind of went overboard on your question, and related ones, in the topic entitled “Conditioned immortality resurrected”. Have you seen that set of postings?

I would be curious to see what your reaction to that topic is. Perhaps you could add to the ideas presented there. Thanks either way.

1 Like

@DeanW @jlcunningham While I cannot speak for anyone from RZIM and I actually agree with the annihilationist perspective, I am familiar with the arguments for eternal torment. And I think the response to your question would go something like this: While Jesus did not suffer eternally, either:

A. The fact that He is God means that He is of infinite worth and therefore His life could free us from infinite consequence
B. The Father turning away from Jesus (I would debate that the Father did not turn away from Jesus, but this would be the argument) was suffering of infinite magnitude for One who had always been with the Father

Again, I do not agree with those positions, but I think that those are the responses you would commonly receive from those who hold that position.

1 Like

In[quote=“DeanW, post:33, topic:4010”]
Conditioned immortality resurrected
[/quo
Thanks for the reply, especially playing the devils advocate!

I’ll look it up. Thanks.

Thanks, Sean, for the additional points to consider. Here would be one way to answer those statements, from my perspective:

“A. The fact that He is God means that He is of infinite worth and therefore His life could free us from infinite consequence”

Yes, He is of infinite worth, and His Life frees us from infinite consequence. The infinite consequence is complete separation from His unending LIfe, or in other words, a death which is completely never-ending (the Second Death). [Eternal conscious suffering would be being kept alive, to suffer, and therefore connected in some way to unending LIfe, not separated from it, and could not therefore be true separation.]

“B. The Father turning away from Jesus (I would debate that the Father did not turn away from Jesus, but this would be the argument) was suffering of infinite
magnitude for One who had always been with the Father”

Suppose Jesus Christ really did die for all the sins of all the world for all time. (But, of course, only those who receive Him into themselves will receive His forgiveness and payment for sin, which is in His Presence alone).

If so, then He suffered (reasonably) infinitely to offer us full pardon. Which would mean (nearly) infinite deaths for a (nearly) infinite number of sins. And, since the wages of sin is death (according to the Word), all whose sin is not covered by His Death, by their own free choice, would have to die a final time.

And that consequence is then an Eternal Punishment since that final, total, completed, Death will never be reversed (or lead to Resurrection). So Justice is done.

The first death for the lost is only a “sleep”, in a sense, since they will be awakened for the Judgement, whereas the Second Death is permanent. And the lost are not given immortality, as far as Scripture tells us, so they are mortal and cannot survive the Consuming Fire of His supreme purity and power, as He draws them close, in perfect Love, with a terminal compassion, in a conpassionate termination.

Thus, as at the Cross also, both His perfect loving compassion and ultimate fairness/justice are on simultaneous display for all the universe to see. Could anything be better?

1 Like

@DeanW Good thoughts :slight_smile: I think when you said that the infinite consequence is complete separation from His unending life that strikes somewhere near what I believe. God is the Creator and Sustainer of life; all life flows from Him. To reject God is to reject life; it is to choose death. Sin separates us from God’s life because it separates us from God Himself, but Christ made a way back to God by clothing us in His righteousness so that we can once again have the life of God welling up within us as a spring of eternal life; a life empowered by the Spirit of the living God.

Yes, Sean, that fits. Also, the lost will be “cast into outer darkness”, but there will be no more darkness in the New Heavens and New Earth.

Rev 21:7-8
"The one who conquers [by trusting in Christ] will have this heritage, and I will be his God and he will be my son. But as for the cowardly, the faithless, the detestable, as for murderers, the sexually immoral, sorcerers, idolaters, and all liars, their portion will be in the lake that burns with fire and sulfur, which is the second death.”

So the bodies of the lost are put into the Fire, but they themselves are “cast into outer darkness”. Yet, there will be no more darkness in the New Heaven and New Earth, since God the Father and the Lamb are the true Light, of the world, and the universe.

For now, we have limited physical vision, so we don’t see all the frequencies of light-energy which are there, even in “total darkness”. But our new bodies will not be as limited, so even what we now call physical darkness will be like aglow with previously unseen radiance.

So it can be reasoned that the spiritual essence of the people who are lost (by their own choice) are cast out of existence in this particular universe. Whether or not that means complete elimination is not clear, perhaps, but at least we can know they will not be in bodies, on the New Earth, in an Eternal Fire, kept alive so they can be tormented / tortured for time without end.

OK, so far?

1 Like

@DeanW I think it is risky to push the imagery used in Revelation too far. Like Jesus’ parable of the ten virgins, this section of Revelation paints a contrast between those who are ultimately in God’s Kingdom and those who have chosen the way of the world. But it is not clear to me that this “darkness” is a literal thing. It may simply be a metaphor set in contrast to God Himself, who is light.

Likewise, the imagery of fire is not necessarily literal. In Jude the words “eternal fire” are used to describe the destruction of Sodom and Gomorrah, in which case neither the fire nor the suffering of the inhabitants was eternal. Rather, the fire did what fire does - it destroyed the city - it consumed whatever was in its path.

I believe that it is a “terrible thing to fall into the hands of the living God” (Hebrews 10:31), but I also think the Biblical picture of judgment, whether on a nation or on an individual, is always one of destruction rather than torment. Even in the OT, God did not torment His enemies nor command His followers to do so - ever. This doctrine, imho, stems from a commitment to the eternality of the soul, which I do not think can be supported purely from Biblical sources.

If the soul is eternal then the view of Hell offered by C. S. Lewis—one in which God has given a person over to their own desires—is more likely to me than any notion of physical torment. God does indeed, when people persist in their sin, sometimes, tragically, give them over to their own devices.

1 Like

I have a tendency to try to treat Scripture as literal as possible within the context. But if the context makes clear that symbolism is being used or sometimes a different aspect of the context, then that takes priority.

For example, the “eternal fire” that burned Sodom and Gemorrah, which is used as an example of what will happen to the lost (in Jude 1:7). Since we are told clearly, twice, that “our God is a consuming fire”, the “eternal fire” that was used to destroy those two cities was “from the Eternal One” and could not be put out by any human means - it burned until its purpose was fulfilled. [By the way, have you heard about the new scientific finding that S & G were destroyed, at about the time of Abraham/Lot by an exploding meteorite over the area? Exciting archeological find!]

So the context makes clear it was not a fire that kept on burning S & G forever. And the specific statements by Jesus about Gehenna destroying both body and soul make clear that the lost will have neither a body or soul burning forever. Of course, Isaiah backs that up with his description of the dead bodies in the “Final Fire”, that burns forever, in 66:24.

Regarding what C.S. Lewis said (a hell where God has given a person over to their own desires), that could fit with being “cast into outer darkness”, which could be perhaps another universe in another dimension where there is no Redeemer, but that still has the One Who is perfect love keeping His creatures alive so they can suffer non-stop for time beyond time. Inconsistent.

So being “cast into outer darkness” would be one way to describe becoming non-existant, since God/Christ/Spirit is Light, and is everywhere present.

Psalm 37 has some interesting statements:

+++++++
“Fret not yourself because of evildoers; be not envious of wrongdoers! For they will soon fade like the grass and wither like the green herb.”

“For the evildoers shall be cut off, but those who wait for the Lord shall inherit the land.”

“In just a little while, the wicked will be no more; though you look carefully at his place, he will not be there. But the meek shall inherit the land and delight themselves in abundant peace.”

“For the arms of the wicked shall be broken, but the Lord upholds the righteous.”

“But the wicked will perish; the enemies of the Lord are like the glory of the pastures; they vanish—like smoke they vanish away.”

“Wait for the Lord and keep his way, and he will exalt you to inherit the land; you will look on when the wicked are cut off.”

“For there is a future for the man of peace. But transgressors shall be altogether destroyed; the future of the wicked shall be cut off.”
+++++++

Seems pretty clear, doesn’t it…

@DeanW I think it would be speculation to try to figure out exactly how God will judge the wicked or, for that matter, reward the righteous. God didn’t give us the details about the afterlife. But thankfully He gave us Himself and that is all that we need :slight_smile:

I agree, the exact details of the End of the lost are not given us, purposefully i believe. The point is do we trust our God to do the perfect thing with them as He will with us who want to be with Him, unendingly.

Historically, it seems that the whole “problem of an eternally torturing hell” was created by one false assumption – that being created “in the image” of God has to include permanent immortality of the soul. But, as i have been considering, if “the Image of God” is the pre-incarnate Christ, as 2 Cor 4:4 / Col 1:5 imply, then Adam and Eve were created “in Christ”, and immortality could only be preserved by a willing oneness connection with Him – which was broken by their rebelliousness.

So they had to be removed from the Garden in order to prevent them from becoming immortal as sinners. And the “found” are only those who allow Him to reconnect ourselves with His unending Life.

If this is the correct understanding, then the very thing which has been used to support unending punishing of the lost was actually proof that the lost will be only mortal at the Judgement, and therefore will die a second, final, time instead.

Ironic, isn’t it.

Gen 3:22-24
“Then the Lord God said, “Behold, the man has become like one of us in knowing good and evil. Now, lest he reach out his hand and take also of the tree of life and eat, and live forever— therefore the Lord God sent him out from the garden of Eden to work the ground from which he was taken. He drove out the man, and at the east of the garden of Eden he placed the cherubim and a flaming sword that turned every way to guard the way to the tree of life.”

@DeanW I’m not sure it’s necessary to pull in the NT verses on this one. I think we simply have no indication in the Bible that the human soul is inherently immortal. I don’t think the Bible rules out this possibility, but I think the origin of the immortality of the soul is actually pagan philosophy. That does not automatically mean it is wrong, just that it was not originally a Hebrew idea as far as I can tell.

Have you ever seen anything in the earlier Testament that makes a claim for a human soul being immortal, Sean? I can’t recall any statement even close to that.

If not, then we can see that no one in the pre-Jesus era would have believed in an eternal place of punishing for the soul. In which case, they were not warned that the punishment for their sins was eternal suffering, since death was the highest penalty in the Law.

Also, the NT appears to point to destruction (with eternal effect) for the lost, doesn’t it?

  1. The persistently lost are called “vessels of destruction” by Paul. Rom 9:22
  2. Their final end is destruction. Phil 3:19
  3. For, “Wide is the gate and broad is the way that leads to destruction, and there are many who go in by it”. Matt 7:13
  4. Gehenna, the Lake of Fire, “destroys both body and soul” according to Jesus. Matt 10:28
  5. The last enemy of God to be destroyed is Death; the lost are destroyed first in the Second Death before Death is eliminated. 1 Cor 15:26, Rev 20:14, 21:8
  6. Sodom and Gomorrah are the example God gives, twice, of what will happen to the wicked - destruction by eternal Fire. 2 Peter 2:6, Jude 1:7. (This was a complete burning up into ashes, with no long-term torture involved.)
  7. God will destroy those who destroy the earth, and they will be ashes under our feet. Rev 11:18, Mal 4:3

We have to change these verses to mean “on-going non-stop destroyng” to justify eternal punishing.

[By the way, this topic was moved from Bible Questions to Daily Evangelism, wasn’t it? Do you know why?]

@DeanW I am uncertain if or why it was moved :slight_smile: While I agree that the soul is not necessarily immortal, I do not think we can say that no one in the pre-Jesus era would have believed in an eternal place of punishment. In fact, there are counterexamples to that point. But I would say that it is difficult to see how Scripture alone would indicate the eternality of the soul.

Yes, i’m sure there were many people who subscribed to the beliefs of pagans in the surrounding cultures, but any Jew who was raised to memorize the Scriptures would not have had any verses, in mind, to suggest unending punishing for the wicked.

To the contrary, there are many OT verses that make clear their destruction. Like Psalm 37 which i quoted above. There are so many examples in the Hebrew Scriptures of God’s complete elimination of, or commandments to eliminate completely, the wicked, but none of a long-term torture of anyone, no matter how wicked.

I am surprised, by the way, that no one here is willing to present counter-proof against the statements we have been making. Surely there must be some person who wishes to defend the predominant view of much of Church history.

Oh, i just realized that i had not read the first posts in this topic, i came in near the end. Sorry. :hushed: :blush: